When Legal Cultures Collide

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In this essay, I attempt to consider the juridical significance of the Irish hunger strike of 1981. I focus on this almost unreal, but tragically too real, 'event' for two reasons. First, on the basis of the rereading or representation that I offer in this essay, the hunger strike provides an opportunity to reflect upon what is perhaps the most enduring and intractable question of social theory: the relationship between structure and agency. Specifically, it enables us to critically interrogate the aspirations and assumptions of a colonial legal structure and the agentic resistance of the juridically colonized. The second reason for my interest is more personal. As I was a law student in Belfast at the time, the strike has been a key aspect of my formative context and thus a constitutive part of my identity. In particular, by bringing into sharp relief the relationship between law, domination, violence, and death, the hunger strike has turned out to be a (not always conscious but pervasive) back-drop against which I have constructed both my political philosophy and my jurisprudence.

    Original languageCanadian English
    Title of host publicationWhen Legal Cultures Collide
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 1995

    Keywords

    • postmodernism and deconstruction
    • politics and ethics

    Disciplines

    • Law and Politics
    • Law and Society

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When Legal Cultures Collide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this