Trying and Dying: Are Some Wishes at the End of Life Better Than Others?

Oliver J Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the United States, efforts to create a "rightto try," or to provide access for the terminally ill to try experimental drugs, have seen overwhelming success in passing state legislatures. This success provided the foundation for advocates' long-term goal of a federal right to try. Yet proposals ranging from very modest advance-care-planning consultations to the "rightto die,"or medical aid in dying, face steep political challenges despite seeming public support. This paper discusses the legal underpinnings of both "rights" and the current political and policy debate over each. More often than not, these "rights" are grantedthrough legislation rather than judicial decisions, and the US Supreme Court has held that neither "right" can be found in the Constitution. This debate says a lot not only about politics in the United States but also our policies around autonomy at the end of life.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Issue number1.0
Publication statusPublished - Apr. 1 2018

Keywords

  • United States
  • right to try
  • terminally ill
  • drugs
  • right to die
  • medicine
  • dying
  • rights
  • legislation
  • United States Surpeme Court

Disciplines

  • Health Law and Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trying and Dying: Are Some Wishes at the End of Life Better Than Others?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this