Abstract
When the Law Reform Commission recommended the Act be repealed in 1995, their indictment was damning and comprehensive: the law used offensive language; it took an all-or-nothing approach, imposing no limits on guardianship orders; it emphasized property and said nothing to constrain the powers nor to stipulate the responsibilities of a guardian of the person; it had few provisions for monitoring guardians of the estate and none for guardians of the person; it showed a lack of respect for the autonomy of adults, permitting "undue interference in decisions about daily living and healthcare"; it egregiously conflicted with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it failed to give people the right to the least restrictive alternative and it was manifestly procedurally unfair.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Dec. 23 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Law Reform
- Incompetency Act
- Mental Health
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Canada
Disciplines
- Health Law and Policy
- Human Rights Law
- Law
- Law and Psychology
- Law and Society
- Legal History
- Public Law and Legal Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Time to Throw Out the Incompetency Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver