Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Supreme Court's 2013 Tax Cases: Side-Stepping the Interesting, Important and Difficult Issues

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada heard three tax cases. Our review of the year argues that the Court resolved those cases by relying on narrow formalistic points that did little to advance our understanding of tax principles of tax law. In particular, the Court was invited to consider the tax treatment of contingent liabilities assumed by the buyer in a sale of business assets; the taxation of amalgamations that do not meet the qualifying conditions for the applicable rollover provision; and the conditions under which rectification should be available in tax planning.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Keywords

    • Supreme Court of Canada
    • 2013
    • Formalistic Interpretation
    • Tax Principles
    • Contingent Liabilities
    • Tax Planning

    Disciplines

    • Courts
    • Judges
    • Jurisprudence
    • Law
    • Tax Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Supreme Court's 2013 Tax Cases: Side-Stepping the Interesting, Important and Difficult Issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this