The Politics of Regulating and Disciplining Judges in Nigeria

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The disciplining of judges is a sensitive and complex challenge. In Nigeria, the complexity is heightened because the process is complicated by socio-political factors and public views about the motivations for disciplining some judges, including claims of political interference by the ruling government. This Chapter argues that both judicial discipline and the work of the National Judicial Council (NJC) – the body responsible for judicial regulation in Nigeria – are caught up within Nigeria’s peculiar socio-politics, a reality that a strictly legal analysis will miss. The Chapter analyzes contemporary challenges and controversies associated with the complaints and discipline procedure in Nigeria. In particular, it asks whether the NJC is undergoing a legitimacy crisis. The Chapter also analyzes the controversial removal of the Chief Justice of Nigeria and the others arrested and situates this within the socio-political and other factors specific to the discipline of judges in Nigeria. In conclusion, the Chapter highlights four specific insights that emerge from the analysis.

    Original languageCanadian English
    Title of host publicationThe Politics of Regulating and Disciplining Judges in Nigeria
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2021

    Keywords

    • Nigeria
    • Judges
    • National Judicial Council
    • Regulation
    • Discipline
    • Appointment
    • Removal

    Disciplines

    • Comparative and Foreign Law
    • Judges
    • Law
    • Law Enforcement and Corrections
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Politics of Regulating and Disciplining Judges in Nigeria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this