Abstract
In R. v. Genereux, the Supreme Court of Canada reviewed the structure of a Canadian Forces General Court Martial and found it to incorporate features which reasonably called its judicial independence into question. This was held to violate the rights of accused military personnel to a fair trial under sub-section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In arriving at this conclusion, the Supreme Court of Canada questioned the legitimacy of Canadian Forces provisions which structure a judicial process governing service personnel as separate and distinct members from the rest of the general population. The Court also reviewed the validity of traditional military values, which contrast with civilian attitudes of contemporary Canadian society.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Dalhousie Law Journal |
| Issue number | 1.0 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr. 1 1993 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Supreme Court of Canada
- judicial independence
- Canadian Forces General Court Martial
- military
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- tribunals
Disciplines
- Courts
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Judicial Independence of Canadian Forces General Court Martials: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Judgment in R. v. Genereux'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver