Abstract
Self-regulation is a sacred cow of the Canadian legal profession. The authors question this assumption on several levels and ask whether, in a liberal democratic society such as Canada, self-regulation really is in the public interest. The advantages and disadvantages of self-regulation are discussed in the context of other Commonwealth nations who have moved away from this type of regulatory structure. Though the self-regulation debate has been traditionally viewed as a "one way or the other" argument, calibrated regulation seems to be a possibility in Canada and, in fact, steps have already been taken in this direction. Devlin and Heffernan conclude by proposing the creation of a Task Force — The Sponsors’ Table on the Regulation of the Legal Profession — to reconsider the present state and future possibility of recalibrated regulation in Canada.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Journal | Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press |
Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2008 |
Keywords
- Self-Regulation
- Legal Profession
- Public Interest
- Commonwealth Nations
- Proposed Reform
Disciplines
- Comparative and Foreign Law
- Law
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility