The End(s) of Self Regulation?

Richard Devlin, Porter Heffernan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Self-regulation is a sacred cow of the Canadian legal profession. The authors question this assumption on several levels and ask whether, in a liberal democratic society such as Canada, self-regulation really is in the public interest. The advantages and disadvantages of self-regulation are discussed in the context of other Commonwealth nations who have moved away from this type of regulatory structure. Though the self-regulation debate has been traditionally viewed as a "one way or the other" argument, calibrated regulation seems to be a possibility in Canada and, in fact, steps have already been taken in this direction. Devlin and Heffernan conclude by proposing the creation of a Task Force — The Sponsors’ Table on the Regulation of the Legal Profession — to reconsider the present state and future possibility of recalibrated regulation in Canada.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2008

    Keywords

    • Self-Regulation
    • Legal Profession
    • Public Interest
    • Commonwealth Nations
    • Proposed Reform

    Disciplines

    • Comparative and Foreign Law
    • Law
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The End(s) of Self Regulation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this