The End of Constitutional Exemptions

Steve Coughlan, Stephen Coughlan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In R. v. Ferguson (reported ante p. 197) the Supreme Court decided that constitutional exemptions are not available as a remedy when a mandatory minimum sentence is said to violate section 12 of the Charter. This is a well reasoned and sensible decision. As mandatory minimum sentences are the context in which the possibility of the constitutional exemption as a Charter remedy has most frequently arisen, as a practical matter Ferguson largely disposes of the issue. Nonetheless, a further clarification at some point that constitutional exemptions are not available in any context, for other violations of section 12 or of any other Charter right, would be a laudable follow-up.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2008

    Keywords

    • Section 12
    • R v Ferguson
    • Mandatory Minimum Sentence
    • Constitutional Exemption
    • Supreme Court of Canada
    • Charter Violations

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The End of Constitutional Exemptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this