TY - JOUR
T1 - The Case Against Entrenchment of a Canadian Bill of Rights
AU - Schmeiser, Douglas A.
PY - 1973/9/1
Y1 - 1973/9/1
N2 - A limited form of judicial review has always been a prominent feature of Canadian federalism. Immediately after confederation, Canadian Courts assumed the jurisdiction to declare a statute to be beyond the legislative competence of the enacting body.' Until comparatively recently, Courts have also assumed that a totality of unrestricted legislative power resides in Parliament and the Provincial legislatures, i.e., as long as legislative jurisdiction exists, there is no limitation on the nature of legislation which may be passed.
AB - A limited form of judicial review has always been a prominent feature of Canadian federalism. Immediately after confederation, Canadian Courts assumed the jurisdiction to declare a statute to be beyond the legislative competence of the enacting body.' Until comparatively recently, Courts have also assumed that a totality of unrestricted legislative power resides in Parliament and the Provincial legislatures, i.e., as long as legislative jurisdiction exists, there is no limitation on the nature of legislation which may be passed.
KW - Bill of Rights
KW - judicial review
KW - federalism
UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj/vol1/iss1/3
UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=dlj
M3 - Article
JO - Dalhousie Law Journal
JF - Dalhousie Law Journal
ER -