Slippage and Ambiguity: the Uncertain 'Progress' of Search Incident to Investigative Detention

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In R. v. Webber the British Columbia Court of Appeal concludes that the power of search incident to investigate detention is available based on reasonable suspicion rather than reasonable grounds to believe. More accurately, on their own reasoning they conclude that it is still available on that basis, which points to the bigger issue. The underlying legal rule they articulate is questionable, but questioning it is at most a secondary focus of this article. The primary focus of this article is to consider the lessons about common law powers which are exhibited by the decision.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2019

    Keywords

    • Appeals
    • Appeal from Conviction or Acquittal
    • Grounds
    • Error of Law
    • Charter
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure
    • Reasonable Grounds
    • Arbitrary Detention or Imprisonment

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Criminal Procedure
    • Law
    • Law Enforcement and Corrections

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Slippage and Ambiguity: the Uncertain 'Progress' of Search Incident to Investigative Detention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this