Self-Regulation, Professional Responsibility and the Duty to Report

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Professional self-regulation, as we all know, is a privilege and not a right. One consequence of this principle is that a profession must ensure that its members serve the public interest. This responsibility requires that the regulators of a profession have systems in place to ensure that the members are qualified, competet and conduct themselves ethically - and that members who are subject to complaints and discipline are provided with effective, efficient and fair complaints and discipline processes.

    However, regulators have limited access to relevant information. Therefore, the members of the profession also have a responsibility to ensure that they personally, and their colleagues, also are pursuing the public interest. In other words, there is a professional obligation on members of a profession to monitor each other. It was this obligation that the Federation of Law Societies of Canada attempted to capture when it included a "Duty to Report Misconduct" in its Model Code, first published in 2009.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Volume35
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2016

    Keywords

    • Professional Self-Regulation
    • Canadian Lawyers
    • Professional Obligations
    • Public Interest
    • Duty to Report Misconduct
    • Mental Disability

    Disciplines

    • Disability Law
    • Law
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
    • Legal Profession

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Regulation, Professional Responsibility and the Duty to Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this