Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not Equal With Opposite-Sex Partners

Donald G Caswell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, which came into force in 2002, and the Regulations under it, expanded family class immigration to include commonlaw partners and conjugal partners in addition to spouses A common-law partner or a conjugal partner may be either an opposite-sex or same-sex partner-as can a spouse, depending upon the currently evolving law with respect to samesex marriage. Under the former Immigration Act, same-sex partners had been admitted pursuant to the discretion to admit immigrants on the basis of compassionate or humanitarian considerations. After examining the admission of same-sex partners under both the former and the current legislation, the author argues that same-sex partners were, and still are, treated unequally in comparison with opposite-sex partners. The only way to eliminate this sexual orientation discrimination is to extend marriage to same-sex partners. In the meantime, the government should facilitate the admission of same-sex partners unable to marry outside Canada.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Issue number1.0
Publication statusPublished - Apr. 1 2004

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • immigration
  • refugee
  • Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
  • common-law partners
  • conjugal partnes
  • spouses
  • sam-sex
  • marriage
  • unequal treatment
  • discrimination

Disciplines

  • Civil Rights and Discrimination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not Equal With Opposite-Sex Partners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this