Rodriguez Redux

Jocelyn Downie, Simone Bern

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Assisted suicide has once again surfaced as an issue of public attention. Just in the past year, four cases have been in the news. In addition the results of a major study on the attitudes of cancer patients in palliative care towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and the results of an Ipsos Reid public opinion poll on assisted suicide were released. Vigorous calls both for and against the decriminalization of assisted suicide followed. Given that it has been fifteen years since the release of the most famous assisted suicide case in Canada, and given this recent spate of attention, we believe that it is worth re-engaging with the issue of the legal status of assisted suicide in Canada. Therefore, in this paper, we first describe the history and current legal status of assisted suicide in Canada. We then argue that, under new evidence and new jurisprudence only available after the Rodriguez decision was releases, s. 241(b) of the Criminal Code (the prohibition on assisted suicide) is unconstitutional - violating s.7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and not saved by s.1. We also append an annotated draft statute that the federal Parliament course use were it to take up the challenge we issue at the end of the paper.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Volume16
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2008

    Keywords

    • Assisted Suicide
    • Canada
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Statute
    • Criminal Code
    • Decriminalization

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Health Law and Policy
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rodriguez Redux'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this