Abstract
In this article we explore the Religion on an Ordinary Day (RoD) methodology in detail. The RoD project collected news stories published on September 17 over the period of three years (2013, 2014, 2015) in Australia, Canada, Finland, and the United Kingdom. We consider our decisions regarding the variability of language, researcher bias, and intercoder reliability in data collection and coding and the implications of those decisions. We offer a case study that analyzes references to New Religious Movements in the news. We considered the intentional choices, unintentional choices in the forms of accidents and misunderstandings, as well as unconsidered choices that may reveal the biases and assumptions of the coders. The article concludes by making several recommendations to address these challenges in future studies.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Journal | Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press |
Publication status | Published - Nov. 9 2021 |
Keywords
- Methodology
- Coding
- Bias
- New Religious Movements
Disciplines
- Communication Technology and New Media
- Library and Information Science
- Social and Cultural Anthropology
- Sociology of Religion