Abstract
This article is divided into two parts. In Part One--by far the longer part--Coughlan et al consider the defence of duress. They consider three primary questions: whether there is a need for two separate versions of the defence, whether a statutory version of the defence should have a list of excluded offences, and how the statutory defence should be phrased. The second part of this article turns to the defence of necessity.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press |
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2018 |
Keywords
- Criminal Law
- Procedure
- Duress
- Legal Defence
- Necessity
- Reforms
Disciplines
- Constitutional Law
- Criminal Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Evidence
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reform of the Defence of Duress (and Necessity)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver