Abstract
In addition to their security properties, adversarial machine-learning attacks and defenses have political dimensions. They enable or foreclose certain options for both the subjects of the machine learning systems and for those who deploy them, creating risks for civil liberties and human rights. In this paper, we draw on insights from science and technology studies, anthropology, and human rights literature, to inform how defenses against adversarial attacks can be used to suppress dissent and limit attempts to investigate machine learning systems. To make this concrete, we use real-world examples of how attacks such as perturbation, model inversion, or membership inference can be used for socially desirable ends. Although the predictions of this analysis may seem dire, there is hope. Efforts to address human rights concerns in the commercial spyware industry provide guidance for similar measures to ensure ML systems serve democratic, not authoritarian ends.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence
- AI
- Machine Learning
- Ml
- Security
- Socio-Technical Systems
- Adversarial Machine Learning
- Privacy
- Human Rights
- Spyware
- Politics of Technology
- Politics of Machine Learning
Disciplines
- Computer Law
- Human Rights Law
- Internet Law
- Law
- Law and Society
- Privacy Law
- Science and Technology Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Politics of Adversarial Machine Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver