Abstract
The present state of Canadian doctrine on causation in tort law is in serious disarray Judges and jurists persist in thinking that it is a factual inquiry separate from policy concerns. This is made obvious in the recent Supreme Court decision in Clements and in the academic commentary around it. In contrast, I insist that the requirement of causation must be understood as being entirely part of the broader debate on the goals and policies of tort law generally Causation is a topic drenched with normative values and should be treated as such.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Journal | Dalhousie Law Journal |
Issue number | 2.0 |
Publication status | Published - Oct. 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Canada
- tort
- judges
- jurists
- policy
- causation
- Supreme Court of Canada
Disciplines
- Torts