Nomos and Thanatos (Part A). The Killing Fields: ModernLaw and Legal Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Law, is so far as it sanctions the coercive power of the state, enables people to do frightening - even deadly - things to each other. Contemporary jurisprudence, the explanatory and justificatory voice of legal practice, fails to interrogate law's interconnection with violence and death and therefore, by a sin of omission, legitimizes humankind's mutual inhumanity. The end result is jurisprudential tolerance of, and acquiescence in, societies underpinned by violence. By identifying the nexus between community (nomos) and death (thanatos), this, admittedly speculative, essay attempts to raise the possibility of a discourse, practice and society that can encourage, reflect and concretize opportunities for human interaction that go beyond violence. What follows, I hope, is an exercise in consciousness-raising.

Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Oct. 1 1989

Keywords

  • jurisprudence
  • coercive power
  • state
  • violence
  • community
  • nomos
  • death
  • thanatos
  • discourse

Disciplines

  • Jurisprudence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nomos and Thanatos (Part A). The Killing Fields: ModernLaw and Legal Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this