Law Reform in Quebec: A Cautionary Note

Philip Slayton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Law reform is everywhere in Canada. On all sides substantial changes in diverse areas of the law are constantly being proposed by government organizations whose only purpose is to make such proposals. The reforms mooted by these bodies (these reforms are typically described as "long overdue") are generally welcomed as correcting deficiencies in law and as signalling the legal system's responsiveness to changing social and other standards. Is the law reform pace, if not furious, too fast? What is the most appropriate forum for initiating change in law? Such questions seem reasonable enough, and yet a traditionalist might well argue that irrevocable answers are inherent in any legal system. Both civil and common law systems, so the argument would go, have their chosen instruments of change, and the nature of those instruments substantially determines the rate and extent of progress. If we accept a system, we must accept the way in which, and the extent to which, it responds to alleged needs for reform of its law.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Publication statusPublished - Sep. 1 1975

Keywords

  • Law Reform
  • Civil law
  • Common Law

Disciplines

  • Common Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Law Reform in Quebec: A Cautionary Note'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this