Abstract
Regina v. Sparrow is the first decision of the Supreme Court of Canada under s.35(1) of the Constitution Ac 1982. The case has wide-reaching implications for the recognition and limitation of aboriginal rights. This case comment will explore some of the implications of Sparrow, with a focus on the test developed by the Court for the justification of government regulation of aboriginal rights. In particular, the question of the cultural authority of non-aboriginal judges to justify legislation regulating aboriginal rights will be addressed.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Journal | Dalhousie Law Journal |
Issue number | 2.0 |
Publication status | Published - Oct. 1 1991 |
Keywords
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Constitution Act
- aboriginal rights
- legislation
- justification
- courts
- judges
Disciplines
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law