Justification and Cultural-Authority in s.35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982: Regina v. Sparrow

Chris Tennant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Regina v. Sparrow is the first decision of the Supreme Court of Canada under s.35(1) of the Constitution Ac 1982. The case has wide-reaching implications for the recognition and limitation of aboriginal rights. This case comment will explore some of the implications of Sparrow, with a focus on the test developed by the Court for the justification of government regulation of aboriginal rights. In particular, the question of the cultural authority of non-aboriginal judges to justify legislation regulating aboriginal rights will be addressed.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Issue number2.0
Publication statusPublished - Oct. 1 1991

Keywords

  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Constitution Act
  • aboriginal rights
  • legislation
  • justification
  • courts
  • judges

Disciplines

  • Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Justification and Cultural-Authority in s.35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982: Regina v. Sparrow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this