R v Trinchi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The Ontario Court of Appeal decision is a useful elaboration of the Supreme Court's decision in R. v. Jarvis , 2019 SCC 10, 52 C.R. (7th) 62 (S.C.C.), articulating the requirements for the Criminal Code 's voyeurism offence. Given the interpretation of "reasonable expectation of privacy" in that case as "being observed in a manner one would reasonably not expect", it can be no surprise that the complainant here was found to have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Indeed, even without Jarvis , it is very difficult to see how a person who is, without their knowledge, video recorded while having sexual activity could be said not to have had their privacy invaded.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2019

    Keywords

    • Sexual Offences
    • Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct
    • Voyeurism

    Disciplines

    • Criminal Law
    • Criminal Procedure
    • Evidence
    • Law
    • Sexuality and the Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'R v Trinchi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this