R v St. Clair

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    A case comment on R v St Clair , 2021 ONCA 895.

    A useful illustration of how courts should properly assess claims of police experience is found in the reasoning in St Clair. The Ontario Court of Appeal notes that the objective test looks at whether a reasonable person "with the officer's knowledge, experience and training, assessing the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time of the arrest, could have concluded that there were grounds to arrest the appellant" (para 24). St Clair exemplifies the kind of caution that should be shown.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2022

    Keywords

    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Arbitrary Detention or Imprisonment
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure
    • Arrest Unlawful

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Criminal Procedure
    • Jurisprudence
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'R v St. Clair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this