R v Patrick

Steve Coughlan

R v Patrick

Steve Coughlan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Patrick notes that an issue was argued in front of them on the appeal which they did not find it necessary to decide. It is a point which other decisions have found to be in doubt, but it is difficult to understand exactly why. It relates to the power of search incident to investigative detention, and the standard necessary before such a search is authorized.

Original language	Canadian English
Journal	Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Publication status	Published - Jan. 1 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

Charter
Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Arrest or Detention
Right to Counsel
Right to Retain and Instruct Counsel Without Delay
Charter Remedies
Exclusion of Evidence

Disciplines

Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Law

Access to Document

https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

Cite this

@article{9c7f3dc1c3914023b1236b43c23e09a2,

title = "R v Patrick",

abstract = " The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Patrick notes that an issue was argued in front of them on the appeal which they did not find it necessary to decide. It is a point which other decisions have found to be in doubt, but it is difficult to understand exactly why. It relates to the power of search incident to investigative detention, and the standard necessary before such a search is authorized.",

keywords = "Charter, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Arrest or Detention, Right to Counsel, Right to Retain and Instruct Counsel Without Delay, Charter Remedies, Exclusion of Evidence",

author = "Steve Coughlan",

note = "Stephen Coughlan, {"}R v Patrick{"}, Case Comment, (2017) 35 CR (7th) 59.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Canadian English",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - R v Patrick

AU - Coughlan, Steve

N1 - Stephen Coughlan, "R v Patrick", Case Comment, (2017) 35 CR (7th) 59.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Patrick notes that an issue was argued in front of them on the appeal which they did not find it necessary to decide. It is a point which other decisions have found to be in doubt, but it is difficult to understand exactly why. It relates to the power of search incident to investigative detention, and the standard necessary before such a search is authorized.

AB - The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Patrick notes that an issue was argued in front of them on the appeal which they did not find it necessary to decide. It is a point which other decisions have found to be in doubt, but it is difficult to understand exactly why. It relates to the power of search incident to investigative detention, and the standard necessary before such a search is authorized.

KW - Charter

KW - Unreasonable Search and Seizure

KW - Arrest or Detention

KW - Right to Counsel

KW - Right to Retain and Instruct Counsel Without Delay

KW - Charter Remedies

KW - Exclusion of Evidence

UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/scholarly_works/1886

UR - https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

M3 - Article

JO - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

JF - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

ER -

R v Patrick

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this