R v Orlandis-Habsburgo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Justice Doherty's decision in Orlandis-Hapsburgo is a thorough and valuable discussion of reasonable expectation of privacy principles, which not only reviews existing principles but also highlights some issues which have occasionally become ambiguous in recent decisions. This is particularly true of his discussion of the normative nature of the analysis: because this is an underlying approach to the right rather than any particular step, it is easily lost sight of.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2017

    Keywords

    • Charter
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure
    • Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
    • Charter Remedies
    • Exclusion of Evidence

    Disciplines

    • Criminal Law
    • Criminal Procedure
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'R v Orlandis-Habsburgo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this