R v Cody

Steve Coughlan

R v Cody

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Perhaps the most important signal given by this decision is the symbolic point that it is authored by "The Court". Jordan was a five-four split between quite different positions, and so that left room for doubt about how firm the Court's commitment to its radically new approach might be: this unanimous judgment of seven members of the Court in Cody with no identified author makes apparent in the clearest terms that all the members of the Court are solidly behind the change.

Original language	Canadian English
Journal	Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Publication status	Published - Jan. 1 2017

Keywords

Charter
Right to Be Tried Within Reasonable Time
Jordan Framework

Disciplines

Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Law

Access to Document

https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

Cite this

@article{efdc047738b04bfebce909490fc40bc3,

title = "R v Cody",

abstract = " Perhaps the most important signal given by this decision is the symbolic point that it is authored by {"}The Court{"}. Jordan was a five-four split between quite different positions, and so that left room for doubt about how firm the Court's commitment to its radically new approach might be: this unanimous judgment of seven members of the Court in Cody with no identified author makes apparent in the clearest terms that all the members of the Court are solidly behind the change.",

keywords = "Charter, Right to Be Tried Within Reasonable Time, Jordan Framework",

author = "Steve Coughlan",

note = "Stephen Coughlan, {"}R v Cody{"}, Case Comment, (2017) 37 CR (7th) 266.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Canadian English",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - R v Cody

AU - Coughlan, Steve

N1 - Stephen Coughlan, "R v Cody", Case Comment, (2017) 37 CR (7th) 266.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Perhaps the most important signal given by this decision is the symbolic point that it is authored by "The Court". Jordan was a five-four split between quite different positions, and so that left room for doubt about how firm the Court's commitment to its radically new approach might be: this unanimous judgment of seven members of the Court in Cody with no identified author makes apparent in the clearest terms that all the members of the Court are solidly behind the change.

AB - Perhaps the most important signal given by this decision is the symbolic point that it is authored by "The Court". Jordan was a five-four split between quite different positions, and so that left room for doubt about how firm the Court's commitment to its radically new approach might be: this unanimous judgment of seven members of the Court in Cody with no identified author makes apparent in the clearest terms that all the members of the Court are solidly behind the change.

KW - Charter

KW - Right to Be Tried Within Reasonable Time

KW - Jordan Framework

UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/scholarly_works/1884

UR - https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

M3 - Article

JO - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

JF - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

ER -

R v Cody

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this