R v Bhogal

Steve Coughlan

R v Bhogal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Parliament's changes to the jury selection procedures were rushed and made without due though to transition provisions or other practical considerations. That task was begun by the Supreme Court of Canada with R v Chouhan , 2021 SCC 26, and Bhogal and Martin (reported below at p 372) show that judges continue to wrestle with those issues, but much work remains to be done.

Original language	Canadian English
Journal	Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Publication status	Published - Jan. 1 2021

Keywords

Jury
Selection of Jury
Empanelling Jury
Challenge for Cause

Disciplines

Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Law

Access to Document

https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

Cite this

@article{68d8c854336f4ee58f281770831ba095,

title = "R v Bhogal",

abstract = " Parliament's changes to the jury selection procedures were rushed and made without due though to transition provisions or other practical considerations. That task was begun by the Supreme Court of Canada with R v Chouhan , 2021 SCC 26, and Bhogal and Martin (reported below at p 372) show that judges continue to wrestle with those issues, but much work remains to be done.",

keywords = "Jury, Selection of Jury, Empanelling Jury, Challenge for Cause",

author = "Steve Coughlan",

note = "Stephen Coughlan, {"}R v Bhogal{"}, Case Comment, (2021) 73 CR (7th) 351.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Canadian English",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - R v Bhogal

AU - Coughlan, Steve

N1 - Stephen Coughlan, "R v Bhogal", Case Comment, (2021) 73 CR (7th) 351.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Parliament's changes to the jury selection procedures were rushed and made without due though to transition provisions or other practical considerations. That task was begun by the Supreme Court of Canada with R v Chouhan , 2021 SCC 26, and Bhogal and Martin (reported below at p 372) show that judges continue to wrestle with those issues, but much work remains to be done.

AB - Parliament's changes to the jury selection procedures were rushed and made without due though to transition provisions or other practical considerations. That task was begun by the Supreme Court of Canada with R v Chouhan , 2021 SCC 26, and Bhogal and Martin (reported below at p 372) show that judges continue to wrestle with those issues, but much work remains to be done.

KW - Jury

KW - Selection of Jury

KW - Empanelling Jury

KW - Challenge for Cause

UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/scholarly_works/1017

UR - https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/1nek75v/alma990014190870107190

M3 - Article

JO - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

JF - Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

ER -

R v Bhogal

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this