International Decision Commentary: Houngue Éric Noudehouenou v. Republic of Benin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The judgment in Houngue Éric Noudehouenou v. Republic of Benin adds to the growing body of human rights jurisprudence on national electoral processes in Africa’s international courts. The decision demonstrates the growing importance of Africa’s regional and sub-regional courts as an alternative venue for opposition politicians, activists, and citizens to mobilize and challenge election processes and constitutional amendment processes where the playing field in their state is uneven. In turn, it reinforces the pivotal role of the regional and sub-regional courts in consolidating democratic governance in Africa, and reveals the limits of assessing the performance of Africa’s international courts solely on conventional measures of effectiveness and compliance.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Volume115
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Apr. 19 2021

    Keywords

    • Houngue
    • Benin
    • Election Disputes
    • Megapolitics
    • Constitutional Law
    • African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Courts

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'International Decision Commentary: Houngue Éric Noudehouenou v. Republic of Benin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this