Abstract
A recent Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision , Y v Swinemar , raised two key issues that threatened access to medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada: Do the courts have a role in reviewing MAiD eligibility assessments? After a person is found eligible for MAiD, can third parties (e.g., family members) go to court to challenge that finding? The Court answered both questions with a unanimous and resounding “No,” thereby adding judicial support to the legislative and policy mechanisms established to meet what the judge in the lower court characterized as the “ constitutional right to the availability of MAiD .”
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- Death and Assisted Dying
- Death and Dying
- Euthanasia
- Law and Policy
- Older Adults
- Physician-Assisted Dying
- Vulnerability
Disciplines
- Disability Law
- Elder Law
- Health Law and Policy
- Law
- Law and Politics
- Legislation
- Medical Jurisprudence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In a Nutshell: An Attempted Assault on Access to MAiD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver