Hydraulic Fracturing – Integrating Public Participation With An Independent Review Of The Risks And Benefits

Constance MacIntosh, David Wheeler, Margo MacGregor, Frank Atherton, Kevin Christmas, Shawn Dalton, Maurice Dusseault, Graham Gagnon, Brad Hayes, Ian Mauro, Ray Ritcey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper describes a fully independent public participation and review process on the environmental, economic, health, community and social risks and benefits of hydraulic fracturing for the development of unconventional gas and oil resources. We describe the approach taken to maximise public engagement in the process and how that participation informed the work of an independent panel charged with examining the scientific evidence and related legal issues. The major findings from the review are presented, including a risk matrix which summarises the frequency, severity and mitigation measures for 16 potential hazards associated with hydraulic fracturing, as they may pertain to the province of Nova Scotia in Canada. We discuss the complexity of managing public perceptions of novel risks such as hydraulic fracturing and conclude with brief observations on the contribution of the review to public policy.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2015

    Keywords

    • Hydraulic Fracturing
    • Public Participation
    • Nova Scotia
    • Independent Review
    • Hazards
    • Public Policy

    Disciplines

    • Environmental Law
    • Health Law and Policy
    • Law
    • Law and Economics
    • Law and Society
    • Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
    • Public Law and Legal Theory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hydraulic Fracturing – Integrating Public Participation With An Independent Review Of The Risks And Benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this