How the Lower Courts are 'Doing Dunsmuir'

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Canada’s leading practitioners, judges, and academics examine the legacy of Dunsmuir . Ten years after this pivotal case, there remain perplexing questions concerning the standard of review for the substance of administrative decisions. Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice Special Issue – A Decade of Dunsmuir offers insight that will shape the impending debates. In this timely collection, a host of administrative law experts deliver a thorough analysis of Dunsmuir , exposing its flaws, and carefully reviewing the correctness and reasonableness standards. Discover an enlightening examination of, among other issues: The philosophy of Dunsmuir Correctness and unreasonableness Fairness Comparative and judicial perspectives The effects of Dunsmuir How to move on from the case
    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2018

    Keywords

    • Dunsmuir
    • Substantive Review
    • Standard of Review
    • Canada

    Disciplines

    • Administrative Law
    • Law
    • Public Law and Legal Theory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How the Lower Courts are 'Doing Dunsmuir''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this