Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Flattening the Claims of the Flat Taxers

  • Neil Brooks
  • Osgoode Hall Law School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The idea that income tax rate brackets should be flattened has gained some support among neoclassical economists, right-wing think-tanks and Canadian politicians. Those propounding the idea argue that flattening the rate structure will simplify the tax system and reduce tax avoidance and evasion. They also argue that it would usher in an era of increased economic prosperity by encouraging talented Canadians to work harder, save and invest more, and remain in Canada. In defending progressive taxation, this article takes issue with each of these claims. It concludes that the fundamental differences between those who support flat taxes and those who support progressive tax rates are their respective views about the ethical justification for the market distribution of income and the need for a relatively equal distribution of economic resources to sustain a vibrant democratic and civic society.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Issue number2.0
Publication statusPublished - Oct. 1 1998

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • income tax
  • brackets
  • flattened
  • Canada
  • evasion
  • avoidance
  • progressive taxation
  • income

Disciplines

  • Tax Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flattening the Claims of the Flat Taxers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this