Ethical and Legal Implications of Frailty Screening

Lynette Reid, William Lahey, B. Livingstone, Mary McNally

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Goals of screening for frailty include (a) promoting healthy aging, (b) addressing frailty with preventive and targeted interventions, (c) better aligning social and medical responses to frailty with the needs of frail older adults and (d) preventing harms to frail older adults from excessive and inappropriate medical interventions that are insensitive to the implications of frailty. However, the medicalization of frailty and outcomes of the screening process also risk harming frail older adults and their autonomy through stereotyping and by legitimizing denial of care. This risk of harm gives rise to ethical and legal questions and considerations that this paper addresses. Frailty screening that is ethically defensible will situate and support healthcare that is consistent with people’s needs, circumstances and capacity to benefit from the care provided. We also call for an informed consent process that incorporates supported or shared decision making in order to protect the autonomy of frail older adults.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2018

    Keywords

    • Frailty
    • Screening
    • Ethics
    • Law
    • Medicalization

    Disciplines

    • Elder Law
    • Health Law and Policy
    • Law
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
    • Medical Jurisprudence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical and Legal Implications of Frailty Screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this