Abstract
Clinician researchers have a number of roles, each of which carries specific obligations. There are times when these obligations may be in competition (up to and including conflict) with each other. Using a narrative case study that describes a group of colleagues discussing their clinical department's participation in an industry-sponsored research protocol, we illustrate a number of the obligations faced by clinician researchers, and discuss how competing interests and obligations can lead to ethical problems. The case study is followed by a discussion of the effect of university–industry relations on competing interests and obligations in both clinical research and the role of the university, and a suggested framework that could be used to determine when university involvement in commercial research is ethically acceptable.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press |
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Clinical Research Ethics
- Competing Interests
- Conflicts of Interest
- Research Ethics
- University–Industry Relations
- Narrative Case Study
- Medical Research
Disciplines
- Health Law and Policy
- Law
- Law and Economics
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
- Science and Technology Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dr. Cézanne and the Art of Re(Peat)Search: Competing Interests and Obligations in Clinical Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver