Dr. Cézanne and the Art of Re(Peat)Search: Competing Interests and Obligations in Clinical Research

Jocelyn Downie, Robyn Bluhm, Jeff Nisker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Clinician researchers have a number of roles, each of which carries specific obligations. There are times when these obligations may be in competition (up to and including conflict) with each other. Using a narrative case study that describes a group of colleagues discussing their clinical department's participation in an industry-sponsored research protocol, we illustrate a number of the obligations faced by clinician researchers, and discuss how competing interests and obligations can lead to ethical problems. The case study is followed by a discussion of the effect of university–industry relations on competing interests and obligations in both clinical research and the role of the university, and a suggested framework that could be used to determine when university involvement in commercial research is ethically acceptable.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2010

    Keywords

    • Clinical Research Ethics
    • Competing Interests
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Research Ethics
    • University–Industry Relations
    • Narrative Case Study
    • Medical Research

    Disciplines

    • Health Law and Policy
    • Law
    • Law and Economics
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
    • Science and Technology Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dr. Cézanne and the Art of Re(Peat)Search: Competing Interests and Obligations in Clinical Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this