Abstract
Does a wrong thing become right when everyone would do the wrong thing?
To kill an innocent person who poses no threat to us and has done us no harm is the wrong thing to do. Nonetheless, given the right incentive - saving our own life, saving the lives of our children - virtually all of us would do it. Few of us are so committed to theoretical philosophical positions about right and wrong that as a practical reality we would allow our families to be killed over them. It is easy to imagine the circumstances in which each of us would behave wrongly: does the fact that all of us would do mean that it is no longer wrong?
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press |
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Charter
- Life Liberty and Security of Person
- Principles of Fundamental Justice
- Moral Involuntariness
- Overbreadth
- Defences
- Duress Compulsion or Coercion
- No Safe Avenue of Escape
Disciplines
- Criminal Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Doing the Right Thing: Duress as a Defence to Murder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver