Abstract
This article uses the World Bank’s Doing Business project to illuminate the politics of “governance by knowledge.” It synthesizes scholarship critiquing the project’s legitimacy and contributes to research challenging the instrumental benefits of improved Doing Business performance. The article’s major contribution is an immanent critique of Legal Origins Theory, which was developed largely to provide ex post validation for the project’s core claims, but whose premises, when taken seriously, lead to conclusions that contradict its “one-size-fits-all” logic. The article demonstrates much can be learned about the politics of development by engaging rationalizations of power on their own terms.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Development Studies |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Doing Business
- Legal Origins Theory
- Immanent Critique
- Law and Development
- Politics of Development Knowledge
Disciplines
- Business Organizations Law
- Law and Politics
- Public Law and Legal Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Doing Business Guidance, Legal Origins Theory, and the Politics of Governance by Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver