TY - BOOK
T1 - Doing Better for Indigenous Children and Families: Jordan’s Principle Accountability Mechanisms Report
AU - Metallic, Naiomi
AU - Friedland, Hadley
AU - Thomas, Shelby
N1 - Naiomi Metallic, Hadley Friedland & Shelby Thomas, "Doing Better for Indigenous Children and Families: A Report on Jordan's Principle Accountability Mechanisms" (Caring Society & Department of Indigenous Services Canada, 2022).
PY - 2022/3/31
Y1 - 2022/3/31
N2 - In Part 1 of this report, we attempt to summarize the long history that forms the context of the need for independent accountability measures to meaningfully address the discrimination identified by the CHRT in Caring Society and prevent similar practices in the future. Drawing from this context, in Part 2 , we set out what we identify as 10 key accountability needs of Indigenous children and families that must be addressed in order to provide effective accountability. Finally, in Part 3 , we discuss features of effective accountability mechanisms and propose three interconnected mechanisms that we believe address the accountability needs. Any of these three mechanisms, individually, would serve to provide greater protection of the rights of Indigenous children and families from the discrimination found in the Caring Society case by improving government accountability. However, as outlined in this report, none are sufficient, on their own, to address all of the identified accountability needs. Therefore, we reach the conclusion that combining all three mechanisms would be the most effective way of preventing discrimination from continuing or re-emerging in the future.
AB - In Part 1 of this report, we attempt to summarize the long history that forms the context of the need for independent accountability measures to meaningfully address the discrimination identified by the CHRT in Caring Society and prevent similar practices in the future. Drawing from this context, in Part 2 , we set out what we identify as 10 key accountability needs of Indigenous children and families that must be addressed in order to provide effective accountability. Finally, in Part 3 , we discuss features of effective accountability mechanisms and propose three interconnected mechanisms that we believe address the accountability needs. Any of these three mechanisms, individually, would serve to provide greater protection of the rights of Indigenous children and families from the discrimination found in the Caring Society case by improving government accountability. However, as outlined in this report, none are sufficient, on their own, to address all of the identified accountability needs. Therefore, we reach the conclusion that combining all three mechanisms would be the most effective way of preventing discrimination from continuing or re-emerging in the future.
KW - Jordan's Principle
KW - independent accountability mechanisms
KW - The Caring Society
KW - National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation Commission
KW - Department of Indigenous Services Canada
KW - CHRT
UR - https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/reports/15
M3 - Commissioned report
T3 - Reports & Public Policy Documents
BT - Doing Better for Indigenous Children and Families: Jordan’s Principle Accountability Mechanisms Report
ER -