Abstract
Much concern and disappointment has been expressed by jurists and human rights campaigners over the inaction ofnational judiciaries in reversing the effects of coups d'etat and other acts which result in the unconstitutional overthrow of democratically constituted governments Against this backdrop, the decisive steps taken b) the superior courts of Fiji to nullify the attempted destabilisation of that country's elected government in May 2000 was a trail-blazing development The author analyses the jurisprudence in this area and explains the implications of the Fijian judgments.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Journal | Dalhousie Law Journal |
Issue number | 1.0 |
Publication status | Published - Apr. 1 2005 |
Keywords
- courts
- human rights
- coup d'état
- unconstitutional
- Fiji
- destabilization
- jurisprudence
Disciplines
- Constitutional Law