Corporate Nonrecognition Provisions: A Comparison of the U.S. and Canadian Tax Regimes

Catherine Brown, Christine Manolakas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article compares the rules governing the federal income taxation of corporate reorganizations in Canada with those in the United States, including transfers of property to a corporation, corporate divisions, share-for-share exchanges, amalgamations or mergers, recapitalizations, and corporate dissolutions. The paper outlines the provisions governing a particulartype of corporate transaction, compares the Canadian tax results with those of the United States, comments on any differences between particular tax provisions, and examines the practical implications of these differences. The authors conclude that although there are a number of parallels between the U.S. and Canadian tax systems, fundamental differences exist that change the assumptions underlying tax planning in the two countries. The North American Free Trade Act (NAFTA)l makes a basic understanding of the similarities and differences between the Canadian and U. S. tax systems and their respective corporate nonrecognition provisions increasingly important to Canadian corporate tax counsel.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Issue number1.0
Publication statusPublished - Apr. 1 1999

Keywords

  • income tax
  • Canada
  • United States
  • transfers of property
  • corporations
  • corporate divisions
  • share-for-share exchanges
  • amalgamations
  • mergers
  • recapitalizations
  • corporate dissolution
  • comparative law
  • NAFTA
  • tax

Disciplines

  • Comparative and Foreign Law
  • Tax Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Nonrecognition Provisions: A Comparison of the U.S. and Canadian Tax Regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this