Abstract
Despite copyright’s expansion into new online spheres and technological contexts, and the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of copy-right scholarship, intellectual property scholars, particularly those interested in digital copyright, have offered little exploration of methodology and methodological issues, and scholarship offers even fewer methodological investigations and debates. This area of Internet-related legal research remains, like others, without established “texts, theories, and methodologies.” This chapter aims to help ill some of that void, by offering an exploration of the problems that can arise when applying certain legal doctrines to online contexts, through a case study of the “chilling effects doctrine” — a legal doctrine that holds that certain laws and regulatory schemes can “chill” or deter people from engaging in certain kinds of legal (and possibly desirable) activities — and its emergence or “transplantation” into debates about copyright enforcement online. The case study provides a helpful point of entry into a broader methodological discussion about applying legal norms to media. Specifically, the author draws on insights from other disciplines and research fields to unpack and scrutinize the chilling effects doctrine and it methodological, empirical, and normative assumptions
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Copyright’s Media Theory and the Internet |
Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2014 |
Keywords
- Copyright
- Online Content
- Digital Copyright
- Internet Research and Methodologies
- Chilling Effects Doctrine
Disciplines
- Intellectual Property Law
- Internet Law
- Law
- Law and Society
- Public Law and Legal Theory
- Science and Technology Law