Consent to Psychiatric Treatment: From Insight (into Illness) to Incite (a Riot)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The aim of this chapter is to go back to the basics on consent to treatment, starting with the right to refuse and building from there. Part II addresses the leading judicial statements on the value of medical self-determination, and in light of these statements, considers what is at stake in psychiatric treatment choice. Part III explores the three core elements of valid consent to treatment -- namely that consent be voluntary, informed and capable -- with attention to variation in the law amongst provinces and territories, and some lines of analysis and critique specifically applicable to mental health care contexts. Part IV considers new directions in law and policy clustering around the concept of supported decision-making – a concept forged through domestic and international disability rights advocacy, which urges fundamental re-examination of the interrelationship of legal capacity, autonomy and distributive justice.

    Original languageCanadian English
    Title of host publicationConsent to Psychiatric Treatment: From Insight (into Illness) to Incite (a Riot)
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2016

    Keywords

    • Distributive Justice
    • Legal Capacity
    • Medical Self-Determination
    • Consent to Treatment

    Disciplines

    • Health Law and Policy
    • Law and Politics
    • Law and Society
    • Medical Jurisprudence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Consent to Psychiatric Treatment: From Insight (into Illness) to Incite (a Riot)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this