Abstract
As Professor James Feehan and archivist-historian Melvin Baker describe the circumstances in which the fateful renewal provision of the 1969 Churchill Falls hydro contract was negotiated, they suggest that the legal doctrines of conflict of interest or economic duress might offer a basis upon which the contract, or perhaps the renewal provision, could be impugned. In addition to interesting historical insights, their analysis offers the intriguing possibility that the government of Newfoundland may yet succeed in its long-standing battle to rid itself of its obligations under the grossly disadvantageous Churchill Falls contract.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Dalhousie Law Journal |
| Issue number | 1.0 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr. 1 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Churchill Falls
- Hydro-Québec
- Labrador Corporation
- courts
- Supreme Court of Canada
- contracts
- renewal provision
- natural resources
Disciplines
- Contracts
- Legal History
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conflict of Interest, Duress and Unconscionability in Quebec Civil Law: Comment on "The Origins of a Coming Crisis: Renewal of the'Churchill Falls Contract"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver