Comment on Jacmain v. Attorney General of Canada and the P.S.S.R. Board

Norman M. Fera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Jacmain v. A. G. of Can. and the P.S.S.R. Board' partly clarifies the rights and "protections" accorded a federal government probationary worker upon dismissal. Regretably, however, with reference to the role of a grievance adjudicator (a federal tribunal) in such matters, and even more so with reference to the role of the courts in "supervising" the jurisdictional findings of such a tribunal, the Jacmain decision is less instructive. The facts of the case are relatively complex. Jacmain had been an employee with the Department of National Revenue prior to entering a competition with the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages. In May 1973 he was appointed to the Complaints Branch of that Office but about nine months later he was notified in writing by the Commissioner of Official Languages that he would be rejected during his probationary period pursuant to the provisions of the Public Service Employment Act.
Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Publication statusPublished - May 1 1979

Keywords

  • Rights
  • protections
  • federal government probationary worker
  • dismissal
  • grievance adjudicator
  • federal tribunal

Disciplines

  • Administrative Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Jacmain v. Attorney General of Canada and the P.S.S.R. Board'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this