Abstract
Both Ramachandran (2022) and Stevens (2022) provide careful responses to our article about universities' failure (Herder et al. 2022) to enhance access to innovations in the Global South. Whereas Ramachandran's (2022) reply underscores our concerns, Stevens (2022) brings an industry perspective to contest our conclusions. Stevens (2022) raises three main arguments: (1) universities contribute substantially to global health, (2) the evidence we rely upon does not support our thesis and (3) our policy proposals will prove ineffective.
| Original language | Canadian English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 45-47 |
| Journal | Healthcare Policy |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan. 1 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Disciplines
- Health Law and Policy
- International Law
- Law
- Medical Jurisprudence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Authors' Response - A Status Quo of Failure: Time to Fix University Technology Transfer to Address Global Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver