Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders, by Maneesha Deckha

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Scholarship on animal rights has long been dominated by the widely held idea that justice for nonhuman animals will not be achieved until they are granted legal personhood. In Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders , Maneesha Deckha provides an alternative legal classification for nonhuman animals. “Beingness,” rooted in relational feminism, post-colonial theory, and critical animal studies, recognizes nonhuman animals’ inherent value, while avoiding some of the downsides to legal personhood, namely, its embeddedness in the imperialist liberal individualism that characterizes western legal systems. Given its anthropocentric nature, personhood must be displaced as the aspirational classification for animals. Beingness is a “new legal subjectivity” that Deckha theorizes is a “solution to evading the impasse that currently encapsulates the core debate in animal law circles”— that is, the debate between animal welfare and animal rights.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2022

    Keywords

    • Book Review
    • Animal Welfare
    • Animal Rights
    • Legal Beings
    • Nonhuman Animals

    Disciplines

    • Animal Law
    • Law
    • Law and Philosophy
    • Public Law and Legal Theory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders, by Maneesha Deckha'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this