Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

And on the Eighth Day, God Gave Us... Equality in Education: Eaton V. Brant, Board of Education and Inclusive Education

    • Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
    • Dalhousie University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The authors analyze the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Eaton v Brant (County) Board of Education in the context of previous legal decisions concerning access to "mainstream" classes for mentally challenged students. They argue that before Eaton, education tribunals, human rights boards of inquiries, and courts deferred to the placement decisions taken by education officials without due regard for the equality rights of the students concerned. The authors welcome the Eaton decision as a new approach in which deference to education officials must be placed within the context of an equality rights analysis - one that shifts the burden of proof from parents and students to education officials.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 1997

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education
    2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
    3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Inclusive Education
    • Equality
    • Students with Disabilities
    • Eaton v Brant (County) Board of Education

    Disciplines

    • Constitutional Law
    • Education Law
    • Human Rights Law
    • Jurisprudence
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'And on the Eighth Day, God Gave Us... Equality in Education: Eaton V. Brant, Board of Education and Inclusive Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this