Access to Justice and the Ethics and Politics of Alternative Business Structures

Richard Devlin, Ora Morison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Despite ongoing concern about access to justice in Canada, the problem persists. Meanwhile, the basic model for legal practice in Canada is the same as when the profession first emerged centuries ago in England. Only lawyers can own and control legal practices. This is not the case in other common law jurisdictions where rules have evolved to allow nonlawyers to own the companies that provide legal services. Based on a comparative analysis of the development of these alternative business structures (ABSs) in Australia and the United Kingdom, and the nondevelopment of ABSs in the United States, the authors argue that ABSs may be at least a partial solution to the access to justice problem in Canada. Recent developments indicate ABSs will eventually come to Canada, at which point, the authors argue the legal professional societies will have a crucial role to play in developing appropriate regulation to ensure ABSs improve access to justice.

    Original languageCanadian English
    JournalArticles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
    Publication statusPublished - Jan. 1 2012

    Keywords

    • Access to Justice
    • Canadian Legal Practice
    • Alternative Business Structures
    • Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • United States

    Disciplines

    • Comparative and Foreign Law
    • Law
    • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
    • Legal Profession

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Access to Justice and the Ethics and Politics of Alternative Business Structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this