A Qualitative Case Study of Pregnancy and Early Parenting in Canada’s Federal Prisons for Women

Martha Paynter, Ruth Martin-Misener, Adelina Iftene, Gail Tomblin-Murphy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of pregnant people and new
    parents in Canadian federal prisons for women, and to better understand their ability to participate in the institutional Mother Child Program. This qualitative case study used semi-structured interviews with people who experienced federal incarceration during pregnancy or the early parenting years.

    Major themes in the analysis include: 1) Reasons why- and why not- to participate in the Mother Child Program; 2) Mothering from inside; 3) Health care; and 4) Strategies and survival. Mothers describe multiple reasons for choosing not to participate or being ineligible for the Mother Child Program; separation as common and traumatic; health services as inadequate; and mental health concerns being met with punishment. Alternatives to incarceration are recommended.
    Original languageCanadian English
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Publication statusPublished - Dec. 27 2023

    Keywords

    • Mother Child program
    • Inadequate health services
    • Incarcerated mothers
    • Federal prisons for women
    • Commissioner's Directive 00
    • Commissioner's Directive 768

    Disciplines

    • Health Law and Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Qualitative Case Study of Pregnancy and Early Parenting in Canada’s Federal Prisons for Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this