A Case for Compulsory Legal EthicsEducation in Canadian Law Schools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The author presents principled arguments, consequentialist arguments, arguments by analogy and arguments by authority in support of her conclusion that Canadian law schools should have compulsory legal ethics education. Among other things, she argues that legal ethics education is an imperfect but essential way to meet the obligations that arise from the public trust placed in the legal profession. She also explores a number of benefits that can accrue to students, law schools, the legal profession and society in general when ethics is a compulsory component of legal education.

Original languageCanadian English
JournalDalhousie Law Journal
Volume20
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr. 1 1997

Keywords

  • ethics
  • legal education
  • Canada
  • legal profession
  • public trust
  • compulsory

Disciplines

  • Legal Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Case for Compulsory Legal EthicsEducation in Canadian Law Schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this